| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF app feature request |
| Date: | 2018-12-23 12:09:31 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEzFjC_rOMvaLDL9Ha4=5n94AqS1bEyxuDB5gJzRoGn-mA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > I'm trying to figure out where this thread left off :) My understanding
> of
> > the consensus is we don't actually want/need a change in the app, but are
> > instead OK with the admin just handling it a somewhat ugly way in the few
> > cases where it's necessary?
>
> The original case (just a mistakenly duplicated entry) seems OK to solve
> with a quick DELETE on the underlying table.
>
> > Or is the consensus to add a "Withdrawn" status, just to solve a slightly
> > different problem from the one that started this thread?
>
> I think there is a use-case for "Withdrawn", it's more polite than
> "Rejected" ;-). But it's not a very high-priority request.
>
Status "Withdrawn" has now been added.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-12-23 14:33:23 | Re: Speeding up text_position_next with multibyte encodings |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-12-23 11:50:29 | Re: CF app feature request |