| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
| Date: | 2021-05-24 09:47:05 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEzFQKO8ybdEkKVvzc1yDQLcU17UKfdgBKhkxWBC8y4D1g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:08 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-May-19, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > It's just a reference after all. So someone supplies a reference to an
> > email on an out of the way list. What's the evil that will occur? Not
> > much really AFAICT.
Well, if you include all lists, the ability for you to findi things by
the "most recent posts" or by searching for anything other than a
unique message id will likely become less useful. As long as you only
ever search by message-id it won't make a difference.
> ... as long as it doesn't leak data from private lists ...
Private lists are archived at a completely different server, so there
should be no risk for that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2021-05-24 10:31:29 | rand48 replacement |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-05-24 09:16:11 | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |