| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update minimum SSL version |
| Date: | 2019-12-03 11:44:32 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyxxFb1CL_V1knnV65O6tK_EGJOysfSXz1o-a-LanOs7Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Is 1.0.1 considered a separate major from 1.0.0, in this reasoning?
> Because
> > while retiring 1.0.0 should probably not be that terrible, 1.0.1 is still
> > in very widespread use on most long term supported distributions.
>
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 are two different major releases in the OpenSSL world,
> so my suggestion would be to cut support for everything which does not
> have TLSv1.2, meaning that we keep compatibility with 1.0.1 for
> a longer period.
>
Good, that's what I thought you meant :) And that makes it sound like a
working plan to me.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mahendra Singh | 2019-12-03 11:51:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-03 11:08:54 | Re: Update minimum SSL version |