From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Karl Wright <daddywri(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe |
Date: | 2011-10-03 07:59:14 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEytvKWHUBszgZmBdE2FUao9sE_AdwBET4T5v5b9BS9NpA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 15:34, Karl Wright <daddywri(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I saw a thread where somebody saw icacls.exe being called by the
> one-click installer. I'm having the same thing - the installer has
> been running for 45 minutes now and is basically going to have to be
> stopped because I'm out of time waiting for it. Looking at process
> monitor, it is clear that icacls.exe is going through every file on
> the entire system and changing its permissions. The process tree
> indicates that it is a child of the installer, and that it is running
> the command:
>
> icacls C:\ /grant "kawright":RX
>
> Clearly this won't do at all and should be considered a severe installer bug.
If it does, it certainly sounds like a very bad bug.
However, according to the documentation for icacls
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753525(WS.10).aspx) you
should use "/t" to get it to traverse into subdirectories, and clearly
it's not doing that. So I wonder why it would go across the whole
filesystem - might tbere be a bug in icacls?
Or maybe it has something to do with inheritance? The way
inheritance-permissions works on ntfs is, um, let's call it
interesting. Maybe it needs to specify the (NP) flag to not propagate
inheritance or something?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-10-03 08:11:55 | Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-10-02 00:00:23 | Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of range values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-10-03 08:02:16 | Re: I don't understand something... |
Previous Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2011-10-03 07:48:45 | Re: I don't understand something... |