Re: OS X to macOS

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OS X to macOS
Date: 2017-02-18 18:40:26
Message-ID: CABUevEyt9=6wi_qR_OreV6+QG-__6a9kv1-rHQVBxe72pAT3ow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> > On 18 Feb 2017, at 17:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
> wrote:
> >>> Apple rebranded Mac OS X to macOS in 2016, and are now referring to all
> >>> versions as macOS.
> >
> >> Have they retroactively re-branded old versions, or do we need to
> consider
> >> that?
> >
> > As Daniel said, they're retroactively calling all versions macOS. I'm
> > sure you can still find "OS X" in places, but that's just because they
> > haven't been thorough about updating everything.
>
> Although it might qualify as nitpicking, I did deliberately leave OS X
> Server
> 10.7 with “OS X” since that’s an app and not an operating system, and it
> was
> when shipped named OS X Server.
>

I noticed you also left the url as macosx. Do we care enough to rename that
and have to set up a redirect, or are we fine to keep it macosx there?

>
> > I think "macOS" is just better all-around for our purposes, and we should
> > be grateful for the opportunity to change our documentation.
>
> +1
>

Good enough for me - applied :)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-02-18 21:49:55 Re: OS X to macOS
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-02-18 18:23:45 Re: OS X to macOS