Re: Russian translations

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I understand Postgres Pro had to invest resources to do the
> translation,
> > and understand their desire to restrict access. However, I think we
> > need to be clear on exactly what those restrictions are if we are
> going
> > to keep a link from our website.
> >
> > We are not. We are already linking, that part is taken care of. As a
> general
> > rule I think it'd be good if these things are clarified for visitors
> there
> > though, but that's independent of us linking to it.
>
> Really? We will link to documentation with any license? I was saying
> to _continue_ our linking, we should research this.
>

Sorry, re-reading we're saying basically thes same thing.

> > And actually, I think the web changes haven't been made. We had an
> example
> > that looks great. Or is it that we should update the link to point to
> the new
> > suggested url (adding the postgresql suffix)? I sort of lost track of
> that
> > part, but that should be an easy fix if that's going to be a permanent
> URL.
>
> I don't know what the old URL looked like. You are right they have not
> updated it --- I saw "PostgreSQL" and thought that was it, but that is
> the Russian translation with the restricted lincense, and the "Postgres
> Pro" docs must be the docs for the proprietary fork of Postgres that
>

Yes. The change with the /postgresql suffix is that postgresql docs are put
front and center, and the fork documentation is on a different page.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/