Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Timmer, Marius" <marius(dot)timmer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Scheffer, Arne" <arne(dot)scheffer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full
Date: 2019-03-09 19:03:54
Message-ID: CABUevEySUALk7Z9wn0baWswS3crfOazH_-nd0O0Pi7nS5SG7TA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 7:50 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:03:24PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I see you've marked the patch as needs review - but as the patch
> > previously was marked as ready-for-committer, and I assume nothing
> > substantial has changed, I think RFC might still be the accurate state?
>
> Yes, RFC sounds good to me. I think that I could look at this patch
> and get it into shape for PG12 as that's an area I am rather familiar
> with. After that it depends on Magnus as he is registered as the
> committer of the patch. I'll be fine to jump into the ship if need
> be.
>

Sorry, for some reason this entire thread ended up getting tracked in my
spam folder :/ Yay the new gmail antispam breakage.

I was definitely still planning to work on it!

The first thing I noticed is that it needed yet another rebase because of
the changes in the SSL tests. PFA an updated patch (very trivial rebase).

(I'll keep working on it, just wanted to throw the rebased patch out there)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

Attachment Content-Type Size
clientcert_verify_full_v07_4.patch text/x-patch 15.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-03-09 19:12:26 Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-03-09 18:58:20 Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?