Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Timmer, Marius" <marius(dot)timmer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Scheffer, Arne" <arne(dot)scheffer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full
Date: 2019-03-09 20:22:37
Message-ID: CABUevEwU2yz8FuNfvvL5mAFC1Wy0iVoYhnW8RhdWPf6H92sSTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:03 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 7:50 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:03:24PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > I see you've marked the patch as needs review - but as the patch
>> > previously was marked as ready-for-committer, and I assume nothing
>> > substantial has changed, I think RFC might still be the accurate state?
>>
>> Yes, RFC sounds good to me. I think that I could look at this patch
>> and get it into shape for PG12 as that's an area I am rather familiar
>> with. After that it depends on Magnus as he is registered as the
>> committer of the patch. I'll be fine to jump into the ship if need
>> be.
>>
>
> Sorry, for some reason this entire thread ended up getting tracked in my
> spam folder :/ Yay the new gmail antispam breakage.
>
> I was definitely still planning to work on it!
>
> The first thing I noticed is that it needed yet another rebase because of
> the changes in the SSL tests. PFA an updated patch (very trivial rebase).
>
> (I'll keep working on it, just wanted to throw the rebased patch out there)
>
>
Patched pushed, with some very minor formatting changes and a pgindent run.

Apologies for the long processing time, and thanks again for the patch!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2019-03-09 20:36:59 Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-03-09 19:12:26 Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?