Re: replication commands and log_statements

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 2014-06-11 13:42:58 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Replication commands like IDENTIFY_COMMAND are not logged even when
> > > log_statements is set to all. Some users who use log_statements to
> > > audit *all* statements might dislike this current situation. So I'm
> > > thinking to change log_statements or add something like log_replication
> > > so that we can log replication commands. Thought?
> > >
> >
> > +1. I think adding a separate parameter is the way to go.
>
> Why? I can't really see a case where the log volume by replication
> connections is going to be significant in comparison to 'all'?
>
>
Yes, but how would you specify for example "i want DDL and all replication
commands" (which is quite a reasonable thing to log, I believe). If you
actually require it to be set to "all", most people won't have any use at
all for it...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/