From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers |
Date: | 2022-02-26 17:14:56 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyRzcq4tFDHzsMZ-x2prH_7-qGC8LuA_ZtA90GY3Ot+gQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 5:11 PM Simon Riggs
<simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 17:03, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2022-02-19 14:10:39 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > IMO we should instead consider either deprecating file based promotion, or
> > adding an optional dependency on filesystem monitoring APIs (i.e. inotify etc)
> > that avoid the need to poll for file creation.
Came here to suggest exactly that :)
> Deprecating explicit file-based promotion is possible and simple, so
> that is the approach in the latest version of the patch.
Is there any actual use-case for this other than backwards
compatibility? The alternative has certainly been around for some time
now, so if we don't know a specific use-case for the file-based one
it's definitely time to deprecate it properly.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-02-26 17:44:09 | Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers |
Previous Message | Shay Rojansky | 2022-02-26 16:51:25 | Re: Document ordering guarantees on INSERT/UPDATE RETURNING clause |