Re: Bug tracker tool we need

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Date: 2012-04-18 05:30:22
Message-ID: CABUevEyKcBxCoj7shBUXEx1hBh0qjqb1EDopY54czixM-nOtFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:30, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...
>
>> I think this is a point worth serious thought.
>
> Indeed.  The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
> (because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it.  At least some
> of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
> bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
> such things.  So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
> Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
> Maybe we can't :-(.

Personally, I'd say we *already* do better than that...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-04-18 05:34:00 Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-04-18 05:21:40 Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join