| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remove pg_standby? |
| Date: | 2014-11-10 15:19:36 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEy8qrQTNm+0rqtQFDeojzJuknHY5aFkVXhOXvu-M+ft=A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> While we're talking about removing old things, is there any use left for
> pg_standby?
Was the original reason to keep it around anything other than
backwards compatibility? If not, then it was backwards compatibility
with a version that's not even supported anymore - so strong +1 for
getting rid of it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-10 15:27:06 | Re: Fwd: How parser works and to add keyword to keywords.h |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-11-10 15:19:28 | Re: row_to_json bug with index only scans: empty keys! |