From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Some thoughts on NFS |
Date: | 2019-02-19 19:04:54 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEy5ZsiTCsdVmqYQ3p9-9yQuJK8RAgTzEsXxv=4=Zzs1ZQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:58 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:56 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > My point is that for iSCSC to be performant we'd need *all* the
> > infrastructure we also need for direct IO *and* a *lot* more. And that
> > it seems insane to invest very substantial resources into developing our
> > own iSCSI client when we don't even have DIO support. And DIO support
> > would allow us to address the error reporting issues, while also
> > drastically improving performance in a lot of situations. And we'd not
> > have to essentially develop our own filesystem etc.
>
> OK, got it. So, I'll merge the patch for direct I/O support tomorrow,
> and then the iSCSI patch can go in on Thursday. OK? :-)
>
C'mon Robert.
Surely you know that such patches should be landed on *Fridays*, not
Thursdays.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-02-19 19:11:10 | Re: Some thoughts on NFS |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-02-19 19:02:32 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |