On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 03:56:32PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > +1, I think this is worth keeping in for 11.
>
> Okay, that's fine for me. Thanks for updating the documentation.
> Perhaps it would be nicer for plugin developers to add a comment in
> bgworker.h as well about what BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN allows to
> achieve?
>
Yeah, that makes sense. Will add as well.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>