Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-02-22 19:30:52
Message-ID: CABUevExyJ1F9CTEA-6MqrOKZNeV84oZN655ymuyqTDN110Q7jA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2018-02-22 08:22:48 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2/21/18 15:53, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > *Two new functions are added, pg_enable_data_checksums() and
> > > pg_disable_data_checksums(). The disable one is easy -- it just changes
> > > to disable. The enable one will change the state to inprogress, and
> then
> > > start a background worker (the “checksumhelper launcher”). This worker
> > > in turn will start one sub-worker (“checksumhelper worker”) in each
> > > database (currently all done sequentially).*
> >
> > This is at least the fourth version of the pattern launcher plus worker
> > background workers. I wonder whether we can do something to make this
> > easier and less repetitive. Not in this patch, of course.
>
> I suspect I'm going to get some grief for this, but I think the time has
> come to bite the bullet and support changing databases in the same
> process...
>

Hey, I can't even see the goalposts anymore :P

Are you saying this should be done *in general*, or specifically for
background workers? I'm assuming you mean the general case? That would be
very useful, but is probably a fairly non-trivial task (TM).

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2018-02-22 19:33:53 Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-02-22 19:30:02 Re: Allow workers to override datallowconn