Re: Weird mangling of a commit log entry in gitweb summary

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Weird mangling of a commit log entry in gitweb summary
Date: 2022-08-06 11:22:38
Message-ID: CABUevExvyMrJUKd=ETVx99Ru7B1SWPuefwrO=Cbpbn2nTG0=Qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 6:24 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:56:56PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > I will try to see if upstream would welcome such a change.
>
> After some discussions it turned out that upstream doesn't have a gitweb
> instance running anymore,

That's interesting to know indeed. I thought they still had both. But
I see now that git itself is purely on github, and the linux kernel
seems to only use cgit.

> so they preferred to remove the whole title
> shortening block. The patch just landed on the master branch (1) and should
> be available in the next release.
>
> [1] https://github.com/git/git/commit/75707da4fa4105c174017d079786e5bba79a96f6

It'll take a long time for that to trickle down to our install, but I
think it's still worth just waiting for it instead of maintaining even
a backpatch -- due to how little this has been a problem.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sahil Harpal 2022-08-07 13:17:36 Pgarchives message thread page design
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2022-08-06 11:07:33 Re: pgarchives new design review