From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Weird mangling of a commit log entry in gitweb summary |
Date: | 2022-08-06 11:22:38 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExvyMrJUKd=ETVx99Ru7B1SWPuefwrO=Cbpbn2nTG0=Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 6:24 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:56:56PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > I will try to see if upstream would welcome such a change.
>
> After some discussions it turned out that upstream doesn't have a gitweb
> instance running anymore,
That's interesting to know indeed. I thought they still had both. But
I see now that git itself is purely on github, and the linux kernel
seems to only use cgit.
> so they preferred to remove the whole title
> shortening block. The patch just landed on the master branch (1) and should
> be available in the next release.
>
> [1] https://github.com/git/git/commit/75707da4fa4105c174017d079786e5bba79a96f6
It'll take a long time for that to trickle down to our install, but I
think it's still worth just waiting for it instead of maintaining even
a backpatch -- due to how little this has been a problem.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sahil Harpal | 2022-08-07 13:17:36 | Pgarchives message thread page design |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-08-06 11:07:33 | Re: pgarchives new design review |