Re: pg_dump -j against standbys

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
Date: 2016-05-26 20:18:43
Message-ID: CABUevExiC6gpxv+a_hQzhdMqfFug6h38SvjQhh_w1phhOLuihw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > Here's an updated patch based on this,and the other feedback.
>
> Looks sane in a quick once-over, but I haven't tested it.
>
>
I've run some tests and it looks good. Will apply. Thanks for the quick
look!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-26 21:35:53 Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-26 20:10:32 Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system