Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Testing list

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing list
Date: 2012-10-10 19:10:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't believe this should be discussed on -www. The stake-holders
>> are all on -hackers, so the discussion should IMO be held there.
> The people I want for this list are *not* on -hackers (see my post), and
> AFAIK nobody on -hackers other than Dunstan are working on testing.

No, but they are also not on -www. And the people they will be
discussing with, and the people who will have to buy in on whatever
that list thinks up, are on -hackers.

Therefor, any decision made without their buy-in, is likely to fail.

>> And based on the discussions last time, I think you'll have to outline
>> what's actually going to be *different* from before.
> Did you even read the email I posted?

I did.

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-10-10 19:12:33
Subject: Re: PUG Listing?
Previous:From: Jonathan S. KatzDate: 2012-10-10 19:09:42
Subject: Re: PUG Listing?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group