| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Testing list |
| Date: | 2012-10-10 19:10:29 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExe8GXCcgVCqZ7sEmYeZSDYKRMtjS+4LujuFO5U9=aHzw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I don't believe this should be discussed on -www. The stake-holders
>> are all on -hackers, so the discussion should IMO be held there.
>
> The people I want for this list are *not* on -hackers (see my post), and
> AFAIK nobody on -hackers other than Dunstan are working on testing.
No, but they are also not on -www. And the people they will be
discussing with, and the people who will have to buy in on whatever
that list thinks up, are on -hackers.
Therefor, any decision made without their buy-in, is likely to fail.
>> And based on the discussions last time, I think you'll have to outline
>> what's actually going to be *different* from before.
>
> Did you even read the email I posted?
I did.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-10-10 19:12:33 | Re: PUG Listing? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2012-10-10 19:09:42 | Re: PUG Listing? |