Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Date: 2022-04-05 14:58:43
Message-ID: CABUevExZRzVybySvBo=R_Q57Y_sxRbs34+CW+u5xROu27kbyXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:54 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note
> > to add to the docs.
>

Many points for bringing that one back :)

Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
>
> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
>

Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're
referring to?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-04-05 15:01:56 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-04-05 14:54:30 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-04-05 15:01:56 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-04-05 14:54:30 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery