| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Early December Commitfest app release |
| Date: | 2025-11-15 18:11:33 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExXaStoKgwGKHF7gcBpUHnZjfASyVEw-r0dmttWGPu76A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025, 17:36 Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025, 07:05 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, IIRC we had security complaints about people being able to enumerate
>> all users without being logged in. Since it's not just users who submitted
>> any data, it was enough to just having clicked a link once...
>>
>
> I think the "without being logged in" is a pretty tiny hurdle for anyone
> interested in this data. It's trivial to create one. IMO pretending that
> locking it down behind a login improves security/privacy is actively
> unhelpful to anyone worried about that. And at the same time it breaks the
> experience for non-logged in users, without letting them know that they
> should log in.
>
Agreed in principle, but it does make it a lot easier for scrapers. And I
think that was the main concern at the time (it's been a while so my memory
could be off on the details of course).
I'm kinda curious who's actually worried about that data being public
> though. It's only names and usernames.
>
Again with the bad memory, but could it be that it at one point included
emails, and we have independently changed that?
>
> If it was restricted to only show those that had actually submitted into
>> it would've probably been considered OK - but at the time it was not
>> considered to be worth the effort to split those up.
>>
>
> I might just go and do that.
>
I think that would remove the whole argument so yeah if that ends up not
being too hard it's probably the easiest way out.
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-11-15 20:45:28 | Re: Use opresulttype instead of calling SearchSysCache1() in match_orclause_to_indexcol() |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-11-15 16:36:37 | Re: Early December Commitfest app release |