From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Template for commit messages |
Date: | 2016-01-28 10:53:44 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExR7PjCY3qrL+qhFqxvDVcuH_o_JOB_mm20cZFGBdVUTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:30:58AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Any reason why not to adapt the git message conventions from kernel?
> >
> > https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CommitMessageConventions
> >
> > I'd expect there are tools already working with that format, making
> > the life easier for us.
>
> Good idea. :-) Updated template:
>
> -- email subject limit -----------------------------------------
> -- gitweb summary limit --------------------------
>
>
> Reported-by:
>
> Bug:
>
> Patch-by:
>
> Reviewed-by:
>
> Backpatch through:
>
> I had to make up "Patch-by:" as it wasn't listed.
>
>
The original format uses the author for that (author != committer in git),
but that changes how we work a bit more. I'd be happy to just clal it
"Author" rather than "Patch-by".
I also suggest a - in "Backpatch-through:" -- since all the others are
intentionally mad ewithout a space, I assume that's for easier parsing.
They also had tested-by, it might be an idea to include that as well?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-28 10:56:19 | Re: Template for commit messages |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-01-28 10:49:56 | Re: Template for commit messages |