Re: pg_upgrade analyze script

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade analyze script
Date: 2020-11-09 11:18:44
Message-ID: CABUevEx9jrOQE=ut-xqgf2fxWr4gwnoExuKduQg-m7CnKMEkOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:22 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:53 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:10 PM Georgios Kokolatos
> > > <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch.
> > >> Please try to address the issues for the upcoming Commitfest.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the notice -- PFA a rebased version!
> >
> > No objections to remove this script from me.
> >
> > I have spotted one small-ish thing. This patch is missing to update
> > the following code in vcregress.pl:
> > print "\nSetting up stats on new cluster\n\n";
> > system(".\\analyze_new_cluster.bat") == 0 or exit 1;
>
> Ah, nice catch -- thanks! I guess this is unfortunately not a test
> that's part of what cfbot tests.
>
> Untested on Windows, but following the patterns of the rows before it.
> I will go ahead and push this version in a bit.

And now pushed, let's see if the buildfarm agrees with the Windows change...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-09 11:22:08 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Seino Yuki 2020-11-09 11:09:29 Re: Feature improvement for pg_stat_statements