| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring of compression options in pg_basebackup |
| Date: | 2022-01-17 14:29:02 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEx99jnXPJ+Tansf_DcoE=LC5uHR-HrduTTAGe8dfCU9=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:56 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 04:15:26PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I think having --client-compress and --server-compress separately but
> > having --compression-level *not* being separate would be confusing and
> > I *think* that's what the current patch proposes?
>
> Yep, your understanding is right. The last version of the patch
> posted does exactly that.
Ok. Then that is exactly what I think is confusing, and thus object to :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2022-01-17 14:43:30 | Blank archive_command |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-01-17 14:27:38 | Re: Refactoring of compression options in pg_basebackup |