Re: documentation typo

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: supersuper1231(at)outlook(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: documentation typo
Date: 2022-01-30 12:44:03
Message-ID: CABUevEx7VxvcgKGyveqyDsrK8ZCpR78OCMK+9djJW2SUpUe=5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 1:39 PM PG Doc comments form
<noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/lo-interfaces.html
> Description:
>
> I assume "inv_oid = lo_creat(conn, INV_READ|INV_WRITE);" should be "inv_oid
> = lo_create(conn, INV_READ|INV_WRITE);", right?
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/lo-interfaces.html#LO-CREATE

lo_creat() and lo_create() are two different functions. They do the
same thing but take different parameters.

It might be worth splitting that part into one section with the
current function (lo_create) and then a separate section with the
backwards-compatible lo_creat function though -- I can see how it's
easy to come to the conclusion you did from reading it, and that could
be made a lot more clear.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-01-30 15:52:48 Re: documentation typo
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2022-01-30 08:50:15 documentation typo