| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay |
| Date: | 2023-11-24 11:17:56 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEx1MXLGwZZheHe1gf3edYrupmS0N+4w1B_VU+c8qtNSWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:21 AM Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:23:34PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > + Non-zero values of
> > + <varname>vacuum_cost_delay</varname> will delay statistics generation.
>
> Now I wonder wheter vacuumdb maybe should have an option to explicitly
> force vacuum_cost_delay to 0 (I don't think it has?)?
That's exactly what I proposed, isn't it? :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shlok Kyal | 2023-11-24 11:35:00 | Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2023-11-24 11:07:58 | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests |