| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 21:36:02 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEx+9N75nek-CCPCXk42TVhQFmtzNQSOCbwYXHTdWh8LUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 13, 2016 23:27, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 05/13/2016 02:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>
>
>> Using something like <year>.2.0 for the second one in the same year
>> could be suggested, but to me that sounds like the worst of both worlds.
>
>
> The amount of brain cycles, electricity, taxes on internet connectivity
and transcontinental data spent on the discussion of version numbers could
have finished the release by now.
>
> How about we just call it 9.6?
>
I'm pretty sure most people aren't talking about this one anymore, it's
about the next one. I certainly am.
9.6 was pretty much decided when we put out the beta, tbh.
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-13 21:36:50 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-13 21:31:00 | Re: 10.0 |