From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts |
Date: | 2016-09-08 12:56:34 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwnygowZc+caz7YJ3FhwU6mnG5m4KsJnn_Lde3GjEiNFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> wrote:
> > Pretty sure this goes back to *our* XML support requiring both. As in you
> > couldn't turn on/off xslt independently, so the "xml requires xslt"
> comment
> > is that *our* xml support required both.
> >
> > This may definitely not be true anymore, and that check has just not been
> > updated.
> >
> > Also this was 10 years ago, so I'm of course not 100% sure, but I think
> it
> > was something like that...
>
> Was it for contrib/xml2? For example was it because this module could
> not be compiled with just libxml2?
>
Yes, that's what I'm referring to.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-08 13:04:42 | Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-08 12:53:13 | Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts |