Re: Reading backup label file for checkpoint and redo location during crash recovery

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana(dot)Narlapuram(at)microsoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reading backup label file for checkpoint and redo location during crash recovery
Date: 2017-09-25 17:52:48
Message-ID: CABUevEwj-CbFs1a-qAmGbYWvjKxibBn+EL1O2CeJDN6WOZFpvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> Greetings Satya,
>
> * Satyanarayana Narlapuram (Satyanarayana(dot)Narlapuram(at)microsoft(dot)com) wrote:
> > During crash recovery, last checkpoint record information is obtained
> from the backup label if present, instead of getting it from the control
> file. This behavior is causing PostgreSQL database cluster not to come up
> until the backup label file is deleted (as the error message says).
> >
> > if (checkPoint.redo < checkPointLoc)
> > {
> > if (!ReadRecord(xlogreader,
> checkPoint.redo, LOG, false))
> > ereport(FATAL,
> > (errmsg("could not
> find redo location referenced by checkpoint record"),
> > errhint("If you are
> not restoring from a backup, try removing the file \"%s/backup_label\".",
> DataDir)));
> > }
> >
> > If we are recovering from a dump file, reading from the backup label
> files makes sense as the control file could be archived after a few
> checkpoints. But this is not the case for crash recovery, and is always
> safe to read the checkpoint record information from the control file.
> > Is this behavior kept this way as there is no clear way to distinguish
> between the recovery from the dump and the regular crash recovery?
>
> This is why the exclusive backup method has been deprecated in PG10 in
> favor of the non-exclusive backup method, which avoids this by not
> creating a backup label file (it's up to the backup software to store
> the necessary information and create the file for use during recovery).
>

Actally, it was deprecated already in 9.6, not just 10.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-09-25 17:53:52 Re: psql \d sequence display
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-25 17:50:29 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output