Re: file_fdw vs relative paths

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: file_fdw vs relative paths
Date: 2020-09-06 17:31:08
Message-ID: CABUevEwgDiqGLD-oC_LRfpRJZRq8mtWPi8FkLtmsSujB=K+2Rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:03 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Bruce, I've applied and backpatched your docs patch for this.
> >
> > Gah, and of course right after doing that, I remembered I wanted to get a
> > second change in :) To solve the "who's this Josh" question, I suggest
> we also
> > change the example to point to the data/log directory which is likely to
> exist
> > in a lot more of the cases. I keep getting people who ask "who is josh"
> based
> > on the /home/josh path. Not that it's that important, but...
>
> Thanks, and agreed.
>
>
Thanks, applied. I backpacked to 13 but didn't bother with the rest as it's
not technically *wrong* before..

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-06 18:15:28 Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2020-09-06 17:05:50 Re: Append with naive multiplexing of FDWs