| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix pg_rewind which can be run as root user |
| Date: | 2018-04-09 19:36:40 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwbUnBEdquAgT5wbi5yOsJmDjMGEN5dK-TB4wy9pL27mQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > Seems simple enough and the right hting to do, but I wonder if we should
> > really backpatch it. Yes, the behaviour is not great now, but there is
> also
> > a non-zero risk of breaking peoples automated failover scripts of we
> > backpatch it, isn't it?
>
> Yeah, I'd vote against backpatching. This doesn't seem like an essential
> fix.
>
Applied, and pushed this way.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-09 19:37:03 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-09 19:31:08 | Re: Fix pg_rewind which can be run as root user |