Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?
Date: 2022-11-21 22:44:08
Message-ID: CABUevEwZDM8+ze-ndA8ec95jmV9WrMauJFyJaUdUpoKqsu7SQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > On 2022-11-21 Mo 15:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> But if we're trying to improve matters in this area, this doesn't seem
> >> like quite the way to go.
>
> > Well, 5 minutes was originally chosen because it was sufficient for the
> > purpose for which up to now the server used its mirror. Now we have
> > added a new purpose we can certainly revisit that. Shall I try 2 minutes
> > or go down to 1?
>
> Actually, if we implement a webhook to update this, the server could
> stop doing speculative git pulls too, no?
>

That would be the main point, yes. Saves a few hundred (or thousand)
wasteful git pulls *and* reacts quicker to actual pushes. As long as you
have a clear line of communications between the machines, it's basically
win/win I think. That's probably why, as Thomas noticed earlier, that's
what "everybody" does.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-11-21 22:45:42 Re: CI and test improvements
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-11-21 22:42:41 Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?