| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |
| Date: | 2022-08-10 16:32:10 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwYdLsJMaJ1jqHwYOrbiEBYV=q5yMKfAqOumWFU-7TtVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > David Steele voted for back-patching this on the grounds that it would
> > make future back-patching easier, which is an argument that seems to
> > me to have some merit, although on the other hand, we are already into
> > August so it's quite late in the day. Anyone else want to vote?
>
> Seems like low-risk refactoring, so +1 for keeping v15 close to HEAD.
+1, but I suggest also getting a hat-tip from the RMT on it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-08-10 16:41:25 | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-08-10 16:20:47 | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |