| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest Bug (was: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates) |
| Date: | 2016-03-02 13:41:56 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwYOoo8ZqHSb+zDXKDBi+8=_Ga5GsVjn+4cdEovLC4B9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> wrote:
> > Needs Review -> Needs Review
> > Waiting on Author -> Refuse moving
> > Ready for committer -> Ready for Committer
> > Committed -> refuse moving
> > Moved to next cf -> refuse moving (if it's already set like this, it
> would
> > probably be a bug)
> > Returned with feedback -> Refuse moving
> > Which basically means we only move things that are in needs review or
> ready
> > for committer state, and that we never actually change the status of a
> patch
> > in the moving.
> >
> > Is that a correct summary?
>
> Yes, thanks for the summary. It looks like this is what people would
> expect based on what I read here.
>
>
Ok, I've pushed a code that does that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-02 13:47:32 | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-02 12:34:15 | Re: Commitfest Bug (was: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates) |