Re: pgsql: Tag 9.1rc1.

We seem to have been fairly inconsistent in whether we call this
operation "tag" or "stamp", if we look at it historically. With a
little turn towards "tag" lately.

May I humbly suggest that we actually start calling it "stamp"
instead, to make it very clear that this is a different operation from
the "git tag" operation that's done on the tree a bit later?
Reasonable?

//Magnus

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 23:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Tag 9.1rc1.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL9_1_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d89b8daf5ee05f9c6fa63695e88d2315a224bf2d
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> configure                     |   18 +++++++++---------
> configure.in                  |    2 +-
> doc/bug.template              |    2 +-
> src/include/pg_config.h.win32 |    6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>