Re: BUG #6751: usage flaws in pg_restore

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: pilum(dot)70(at)uni-muenster(dot)de
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6751: usage flaws in pg_restore
Date: 2012-07-31 10:35:44
Message-ID: CABRT9RB-CU6S=dC_+8k=GBq5Srcp2emu1g0=ijYL0w0vvhP_sA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, <pilum(dot)70(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:
> We've been using PostgreSQL for years now.
> It's great.
> Only the usage of pg_restore is annoying
> (Version 8.3 to 9.1 tested).

> Given Answer:
> pg_restore: [archiver] input file does not appear to be a valid archive

This has already been fixed. PostgreSQL 9.2beta says:
pg_restore: [archiver] input file appears to be a text format dump.
Please use psql.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gsaviane 2012-07-31 15:06:36 BUG #6787: Query planner estimates worng costs on nodes
Previous Message manojk.softengineer 2012-07-31 10:00:19 BUG #6786: postgresql installed with mingw