From: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded |
Date: | 2025-08-27 15:54:25 |
Message-ID: | CABPTF7WrJ=GOQR2Bh5E8gni8sYiFdmvzEH+nVuuzRFjxsZ-GBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
I did a rebase for the patch to v8 and incorporated a few changes:
1) Updated documentation, added new tests, and applied minor code
adjustments based on prior review comments.
2) Tweaked the initialization of waitReplayLSNState so that
non-backend processes can call wait for replay.
Started a new thread [1] and attached a patch addressing the polling
issue in the function
read_local_xlog_page_guts built on the infra of patch v8.
Feedbacks welcome.
Best,
Xuneng
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-Implement-WAIT-FOR-command.patch | application/x-patch | 62.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vicky Vergara | 2025-08-27 16:02:26 | Re: END is not a reserved word |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-08-27 15:42:50 | Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches |