Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date: 2017-04-19 05:51:35
Message-ID: CABOikdPuyS9Yzo8r4aVo=kE7B_n_fdrh4LYMS2WJMa3EQTv45g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk
> wrote:

> >>>>> "Pavan" == Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> Pavan> I am attaching a patch that throws a similar ERROR during
> Pavan> planning even for 9.5. AFAICS in presence of grouping sets, we
> Pavan> always decide to use sort-based implementation for grouping, but
> Pavan> do not check if the columns support ordering or not.
>
> Hmmm. This is obviously my fault somewhere... the patch looks good, I'll
> deal with it shortly.
>
>
Thanks. It might be a good idea to include that test case from the master.
Please let me know if you would like me to send a new patch which includes
that.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Michálek 2017-04-19 06:15:29 Re: Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2017-04-19 05:49:17 Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE