| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values | 
| Date: | 2018-03-11 05:27:52 | 
| Message-ID: | CABOikdNoB5rRac8AgEkVKzCQVUPx+yW96w3x=8KyqbxL2rVg1A@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> >
> > So yes, the benefits of the patch go down with higher number of clients,
> but
> > it does not entirely vanish.
>
> What if you implement my suggestion?
>
> That should improve the multi-client case considerably.
>
Yes, I will try that next - it seems like a good idea. So the idea would
be: check if the block is still the rightmost block and the insertion-key
is greater than the first key in the page. If those conditions are
satisfied, then we do a regular binary search within the page to find the
correct location. This might add an overhead of binary search when keys are
strictly ordered and a single client is inserting the data. If that becomes
a concern, we might be able to look for that special case too and optimise
for it too.
Thanks,
Pavan
-- 
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-03-11 05:48:37 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 | 
| Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2018-03-11 05:22:02 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |