Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-02-25 05:20:57
Message-ID: CABOikdMTYyvH0av9RMGEA7eYy=9Rk72+OihCAfc+VzKfUEnDDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> And there are no bugs, right? :-)

Yeah yeah absolutely nothing. Just like any other feature committed to
Postgres so far ;-)

I need to polish the chain conversion patch a bit and also add missing
support for redo, hash indexes etc. Support for hash indexes will need
overloading of ip_posid bits in the index tuple (since there are no free
bits left in hash tuples). I plan to work on that next and submit a fully
functional patch, hopefully before the commit-fest starts.

(I have mentioned the idea of overloading ip_posid bits a few times now and
haven't heard any objection so far. Well, that could either mean that
nobody has read those emails seriously or there is general acceptance to
that idea.. I am assuming latter :-))

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-25 05:59:19 Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2017-02-25 04:30:32 Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: Steps inside ExecEndGather)