From: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: submake-errcodes |
Date: | 2018-04-12 18:22:45 |
Message-ID: | CABAq_6FPVTbu+TQSY+eLwhzzWrcNzSjJ2ko1xNMrCBe8iRGyyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>> Is it worth exploring the idea of changing to a non-recursive style of
>> makefile?
>
> Not post-feature-freeze, for sure. Whether it's worth the work as a
> long-term project, I dunno.
I've been taking a look at this in my limited free time, so I might as
well publicly register my interest here. Moving to non-recursive Make
will probably be quite a bit of work/pain, but I also think it's
probably worth it in the end.
(We make heavy use of automated builds, and having a complete
dependency graph should speed those up considerably, in addition to
the maintenance benefits already implied here.)
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-04-12 18:23:29 | Re: psql leaks memory on query cancellation |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-04-12 18:10:30 | Re: crash with sql language partition support function |