Re: Fix PGTYPESdate_fmt_asc overflow when a year does not fit "yyyy"

From: Andrey Rachitskiy <pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix PGTYPESdate_fmt_asc overflow when a year does not fit "yyyy"
Date: 2026-09-04 05:01:15
Message-ID: CAB8bMivJZffaOmLubjEaA8BAWW8Unh3=Uh=X39N_fAAAM-Ch8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

чт, 20 авг. 2026 г. в 12:06, Andrey Rachitskiy <pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
> чт, 20 авг. 2026 г. в 03:17, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> -[NO_PID]: ECPGtrans on line 393: action "rollback"; connection
>> "ecpg1_regression"
>> +[NO_PID]: ECPGtrans on line 412: action "rollback"; connection
>> "ecpg1_regression"
>>
>> The modified test is failing in my run, it seems this should be 409?
>>
>
> Dear Zsolt,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> After shortening the test comment I updated the expected .c #line
> markers but forgot the matching stderr line number. Fixed in the
> attached v2.
>
>
>
Hello everybody!

Reminder on this patch.
Have a good end of the week and enjoy the weekend.

--
Regards,
Rachitskiy Andrey

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-09-04 05:21:52 Re: Follow-up review items for update_deleted
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-09-04 04:58:55 Re: SUM(int2)/SUM(int4) do not detect overflow of the int8 accumulator