Re: [doc] clarify behaviour of pg_dump's -t/--table option with non-tables

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [doc] clarify behaviour of pg_dump's -t/--table option with non-tables
Date: 2020-10-06 13:44:59
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=hijOtVKuRz6fY573RrUK5yPOO3r99n+c9DARuCKHb+Qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2020年10月6日(火) 21:58 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> Hi
>
> Recently I ran into a case where someone was wondering why it was not
> possible to dump the contents of a view, even though the documentation [1]
> seems to imply this is possible.
>
> Currently it says:
>
> Dump only tables with names matching pattern. For this purpose, "table"
> includes views, materialized views, sequences, and foreign tables.
>
> The attached patch attempts to clarify that only definitions of those objects
> will be dumped, and also mentions that dumping foreign table data requires the
> --include-foreign-data option.
>
> I suggest backpatching any changes to Pg13 where the --include-foreign-data
> option was added.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-pgdump.html

Better version attached.

Regards

Ian Barwick

--
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
doc-pg_dump-clarify-table-option.v2.patch text/x-patch 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-10-06 13:48:05 Re: [doc] clarify behaviour of pg_dump's -t/--table option with non-tables
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-10-06 13:40:02 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)