Re: Tracking role modification timestamps in pg_authid / pg_roles

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tracking role modification timestamps in pg_authid / pg_roles
Date: 2026-08-21 04:28:32
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=gZzP2qLhxxY339QVk+GCP41ranKnm4_O=qJjpfF+OYtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2026年8月21日(金) 12:08 Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
(...)
> Happy to hear whether this is a direction the community would be open to at all

Just my personal opinion, but at a glance it seems useful to have, for
the reasons you mention.

> and whether rollastupdated is a reasonable name and column placement, before I take it further.

IMO "last" is implicit anyway, "rolupdated" conveys the same meaning
and is easier to read.

Regards

Ian Barwick

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-08-21 04:30:40 Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2026-08-21 03:42:20 Re: Row pattern recognition