Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date: 2017-02-08 07:30:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTzfTjQ2MfNC_2NrnRd-ykwuN6UqNNh-+VTALshTtEkkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What is sense for list of databases?

ECPG uses it for example, see 0992259.

> Some option --template can be great - with backpatch if it is possible.

That's not really complicated to patch... That could be a nice task
for a starter.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-02-08 07:33:30 Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-02-08 07:24:08 Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress