From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress input/output directory option |
Date: | 2011-09-29 23:27:08 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTvd+zGFw2whkhj_2dJESUG+S5BawPVYi9ddNy4pRMi-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Why are there no options in_regress to specify the directory where input
> and
> > output data are located?
> > Such options would bring more flexibility when running regressions
> without
> > make check/installcheck for an external application.
> > Is there a particular reason for that? Or do you think that pg_regress
> > should be only used with make check?
>
> It has --inputdir and --outputdir - is that not what you need?
>
Yes thanks.
Regards,
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-29 23:27:35 | Re: pg_upgrade - add config directory setting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-29 23:03:01 | Re: Re: Optimizing pg_trgm makesign() (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build) |