Re: About xmllint checking for the validity of postgres.xml in 9.5

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About xmllint checking for the validity of postgres.xml in 9.5
Date: 2014-12-03 13:25:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTuab3T-5jA8j_9SukVpn1nFi1J6XUuhB9FbpVXm_4ffQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since commit 5d93ce2d, the output of xmllint is checked by passing
>> --valid to it. Isn't that a regression with what we were doing for
>> pre-9.4 versions? For example, with 9.4 and older versions it is
>> possible to compile man pages even if the xml spec is not entirely
>> valid when using docbook 4.2.
>
> I don't think this is a regression. It just means we're stricter than
> before. Is there a reason behind this tinkering?
Just got surprised by how we got strict on master when doing a build
of the docs using docbook 4.2 and some old versions of docbook-dsssl
and docbook-xsl: man pages can still compile even if the spec is not
exactly correct sometimes.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-12-03 14:01:38 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-12-03 13:05:42 Re: Many processes blocked at ProcArrayLock