| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |
| Date: | 2017-11-30 02:03:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTsymCHtBjx_F-efYLFyXmA2VJrfmrpokeSh-SJcgVxVQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah and I think something like that can happen after your patch
> because now the memory for tuples returned via TupleQueueReaderNext
> will be allocated in ExecutorState and that can last for long. I
> think it is better to free memory, but we can leave it as well if you
> don't feel it important. In any case, I have written a patch, see if
> you think it makes sense.
OK. I can see some fresh and unreviewed patches so moved to next CF.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-11-30 02:05:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-30 02:02:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |