Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Date: 2014-12-22 01:20:03
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTsDT2A3odxiwizEBPkQeAmWj=NFph2z6Mevh6jM=bmRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 7:04 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It also looks like your OIDs have been nabbed by some jsonb stuff.
> DETAIL: Key (oid)=(3267) is duplicated.
Use src/include/catalog/unused_oids to track the OIDs not yet used in
the catalogs when adding new objects for a feature.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-12-22 02:04:56 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-22 01:15:13 Re: btree_gin and ranges