From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods |
Date: | 2016-06-02 07:00:33 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTr-cwkc=Bp5nikYwsMvF5Er5FL+GgTMDhU5zq04BaUTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have added an open item for 9.6 regarding this patch, that would be
>> good to complete this work in this release for consistency with the
>> other objects.
>
> Doh. I forgot to update psql --help.
And Query_for_list_of_access_methods was defined more or less twice,
the one of my patch having an error...
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Add-support-for-COMMENT-ON-and-psql-meta-command-for.patch | text/x-patch | 10.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-06-02 08:49:41 | Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-02 06:42:42 | Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods |