Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods
Date: 2016-06-02 07:00:33
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTr-cwkc=Bp5nikYwsMvF5Er5FL+GgTMDhU5zq04BaUTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have added an open item for 9.6 regarding this patch, that would be
>> good to complete this work in this release for consistency with the
>> other objects.
>
> Doh. I forgot to update psql --help.

And Query_for_list_of_access_methods was defined more or less twice,
the one of my patch having an error...
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-support-for-COMMENT-ON-and-psql-meta-command-for.patch text/x-patch 10.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-06-02 08:49:41 Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-02 06:42:42 Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods